Transdisciplinariedad y consciencia: hacia un modelo integrado
Palabras clave:
consciencia, educación integral, humanidades, mecánica cuántica, transdisciplinariedadResumen
Aunque ha habido muchos avances en la física, las implicaciones de las teorías cuánticas no se han incorporado a las humanidades. Como resultado, gran parte de la academia se ha mantenido en la cosmovisión del siglo XVII o XVIII, y algunos estudiosos aún buscan analizar la espiritualidad en términos dualistas, reduccionistas y materialistas que, de hecho, han sido reempla-zados. A menudo, tales perspectivas resultan en pensamientos equivocados basados en errores de categoría. En este artículo, se señala el camino más allá de este dualismo, y se argumenta a favor de enfoques transdisciplinares para el estudio de la religión y, en particular, de la espiritualidad. Se postula un nuevo modelo para comprender la interioridad, prefigurando un enfoque unificado y transdisciplinar que involucra la física cuántica y las humanidades, donde radican las ciencias de la educación.
Descargas
Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
Citas
Antes, P., Geertz, A., y Warne, R. (2008). New Approaches to the Study of Religion. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Baruss, I., y Mossbridge, J. (2016). Transcendent Mind: Rethinking the Science of Consciousness. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association. Edward Kelly, Adam Crabtree, and Paul Marshall. (2015) Beyond Physicalism: Toward Reconciliation of Science and Spirituality. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield. Bache, C. (2000). Dark Night, Early Dawn: Steps to a Deep Ecology of Mind. Albany: SUNY P. Bohr, N. (1934). Atomic Theory and the Description of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. Heisenberg, Werner. (1958) Physics and Philosophy New York: Harper. Descombes, V. (2004). Le complément du sujet Paris: Gallimard. Drees, W. (2016). Existentialist Literature, Cognitive Science of Religion, and the Scientification of Religion, Zygon 51(4): 833-834 Dubuisson, D. (2003). The Western Construction of Religion: Myths, Knowledge, and Ideology [L’Occident et la religion: Mythes, science et idéologie, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP. Dubuisson, D. (2006). Twentieth Century Mythologies: Dumézil, Lévy-Strauss, Eliade. London: Routledge. Greene, B. (2000) The Elegant Universe: Superstrings, Hidden Dimensions, and the Quest for the Ultimate Theory London: Vintage Series, Random House. Brian Greene, (2000) [edition cited] L’Univers elegant: Une revolution scientifique:d l’infiniment grand à l’infiniment petit, l’unification de toutes les theories de la physique, trans. Céline Laroche. Paris : Robert Laffont. Hanegraaff, W. (1995). Empirical Method in the Study of Esotericism, Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 7(2):99-129. Hanegraaff, W. (2013). Western Esotericism: A Guide for the Perplexed London: Bloomsbury. Jones, J. (2016). Can Science Explain Religion? New York: Oxford UP. Lee, K. et al., (2011). Entangling Macroscopic Diamonds at Room Temperature, Science, 334(6060): 1253-1256; Juan Yin, et al. 2012. Quantum Teleportation and Entanglement Distribution Over 100-kilometre Free-space Channels, in Nature, 488:185-188. doi:10.1038/nature11332
Lovejoy, A. (1934). The Great Chain of Being: A Study of the History of an Idea. Cambridge: Harvard UP.Martin, L., y Wiebe, D. (2014). Establishing a Beachhead: NAASR Twenty Years Later, at available here: https://naasrreligion.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/establishinga-beachhead.pdf Nicolescu, B. (2002). Manifesto of Transdisciplinarity, Karen-Claire Voss, trs. Albany: SUNY P. Nicolescu, B, (2015). From Modernity to Cosmodernity: Science, Culture, and Spirituality Albany: SUNY P. Nikkel, D. (2015). The Dualistic, Discarnate Picture that Haunts the Cognitive Science of Religion, Zygon 50(September 2015): 621-646. Penrose, R, (2005). The Road to Reality: A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe New York: Knopf. Peterson, G. (2010). Are Evolutionary/Cognitive Theories of Religion Relevant for Philosophy of Religion? Zygon, 45(3): 545-557. Slingerland, E. (2008)The Study of Religion in the Age of Cognitive Science. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 76:375–411. Stuckrad, K. (2014). The Scientification of Religion: An Historical Study of Discursive Change Berlin: de Gruyter. Stuckrad, K. (2016). The Hybridity of Scientific Knowledge: A Response to Leonardo Ambasciano, in Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 51(4) at http://www.zygonjournal.org/issue2016_4.html [DOI: 10.1111/zygo.12305]. Versluis, A, (2006). The New Inquisitions: Heretic-hunting and the Origins of Modern Totalitarianism New York: Oxford UP. Versluis, A. (2007). Magic and Mysticism: An Introduction to Western Esotericism Lanham: Rowman Littlefield. Versluis, A. (2017). Platonic Mysticism: Contemplative Science, Philosophy, Literature, and Art Albany: SUNY P. Wallace, A. (2004). The Taboo of Subjectivity: Toward a New Science of Consciousness New York: Oxford UP. Wallace, A. (2010). Hidden Dimensions: The Unification of Physics and Consciousness New York: Columbia UP. Wallace, Allan B., (2011) Contemplative Science: Where Buddhism and Neuroscience Converge New York: Columbia UP. Wiebe, D. (1999). The Politics of Religious Studies: The Continuing Conflict with Theology in the Academy New York: Palgrave. Wiebe, D. (2006). The Eternal Return All Over Again: The Religious Conversation Endures, Journal of the American Academy of Religion 74(3): 674-696.
Lovejoy, A. (1934). The Great Chain of Being: A Study of the History of an Idea. Cambridge: Harvard UP.Martin, L., y Wiebe, D. (2014). Establishing a Beachhead: NAASR Twenty Years Later, at available here: https://naasrreligion.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/establishinga-beachhead.pdf Nicolescu, B. (2002). Manifesto of Transdisciplinarity, Karen-Claire Voss, trs. Albany: SUNY P. Nicolescu, B, (2015). From Modernity to Cosmodernity: Science, Culture, and Spirituality Albany: SUNY P. Nikkel, D. (2015). The Dualistic, Discarnate Picture that Haunts the Cognitive Science of Religion, Zygon 50(September 2015): 621-646. Penrose, R, (2005). The Road to Reality: A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe New York: Knopf. Peterson, G. (2010). Are Evolutionary/Cognitive Theories of Religion Relevant for Philosophy of Religion? Zygon, 45(3): 545-557. Slingerland, E. (2008)The Study of Religion in the Age of Cognitive Science. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 76:375–411. Stuckrad, K. (2014). The Scientification of Religion: An Historical Study of Discursive Change Berlin: de Gruyter. Stuckrad, K. (2016). The Hybridity of Scientific Knowledge: A Response to Leonardo Ambasciano, in Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 51(4) at http://www.zygonjournal.org/issue2016_4.html [DOI: 10.1111/zygo.12305]. Versluis, A, (2006). The New Inquisitions: Heretic-hunting and the Origins of Modern Totalitarianism New York: Oxford UP. Versluis, A. (2007). Magic and Mysticism: An Introduction to Western Esotericism Lanham: Rowman Littlefield. Versluis, A. (2017). Platonic Mysticism: Contemplative Science, Philosophy, Literature, and Art Albany: SUNY P. Wallace, A. (2004). The Taboo of Subjectivity: Toward a New Science of Consciousness New York: Oxford UP. Wallace, A. (2010). Hidden Dimensions: The Unification of Physics and Consciousness New York: Columbia UP. Wallace, Allan B., (2011) Contemplative Science: Where Buddhism and Neuroscience Converge New York: Columbia UP. Wiebe, D. (1999). The Politics of Religious Studies: The Continuing Conflict with Theology in the Academy New York: Palgrave. Wiebe, D. (2006). The Eternal Return All Over Again: The Religious Conversation Endures, Journal of the American Academy of Religion 74(3): 674-696.
Publicado
2018-07-15
Cómo citar
Versluis, A. ., & Nicolescu, B. . (2018). Transdisciplinariedad y consciencia: hacia un modelo integrado. Runae, (3), 17–36. Recuperado a partir de https://revistas.unae.edu.ec/index.php/runae/article/view/100
Número
Sección
Artículos
Licencia
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
